Skip to content

Stuart

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stuart commented  · 

    Okay, my indentation in the example structure was lost. Let's try this:

    Parent
    --Child1
    --Child2
    --Child3
    Sibling
    --Child4

    Is that clearer?

    Stuart shared this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stuart supported this idea  · 
  3. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stuart commented  · 

    I second this. Things like Waiting For lists can be half implemented with tags but they're essentially agenda items associated with a date so it'd be great if they could work with the time @ tags

    [How To GTD: The Waiting For List](http://how-to-gtd.blogspot.com/2012/06/waiting-for-list.html)

    Stuart supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base